The major issues
Preservation
or Conservation?
Include
just wild species or domesticated species too?
Everything coalesces around rights to genetic resources.OECD countries wanted conservation, which is understood to include the human interface.
A draft on management of wild genetic resources was presented by the IUCN in 1981. This draft emphasized in situ preservation of wild species and included no domesticates. The USA presented to the UNEP a version of this agenda.Developing countries view the inclusion of domesticated species in the CBD as related to long-running discussions, in the FAO, on property rights to genetic resources. [A brief history is tabulated here]
In the FAO Undertaking of 1983, seeds were considered to be the "common heritage of mankind." However, given that in 1989 the FAO determined that intellectual property rights (IPRs) were compatible with the idea of genetic resources as "common heritage of mankind," developing countries returned to the idea of genetic resources as a matter of national sovereignty --i.e., they have the sovereign authority to determine access to genetic resources.Changed property rights regime
How get the "owners" to talk?
How get the "users" to share
the responsibility?
The Scientific issues